SharePoint - showing Contacts in People Search results

/

 

Scenario:

  • You have a working and functioning People Search page, and it's used to show information (and lovely photos) of your employees and acting as a very capable office phone book.
  • HR now wants to add more people to the list, people that, for some reason (may be they are kiosk workers, or external contractors), don't have an Active Directory account.  The phantom people.

Solution:

  • Create a standard SharePoint Contacts list
  • Include this list as part of the People search scope
  • Configure Search Metadata Properties to bring across the correct Site Columns, ultimately, showing both Real users and Contacts from Contact List in the same People Search results.

 

Create a contact list

image

 

The Contact list doesn't come with a Contact Photo by default, we should add one

 

 

Configuring Search

  • Create a new Search Scope "Humans"

    image
  • Add rules, in addition to the rule to include People, which is "contentclass = urn:content-class:SPSPeople"
    Add rule to also include Folder = http://server/Lists/Contacts

    image
  • You'll need to do a full crawl, which will pick up the Contact list, this will also pick up a crawled property for Contact_x0020_Photo
  • Then update the Scopes

 

Configure Search Page

 

  • Configure the Search Page
    • Change People Search Core Results webpart:
    • Scope: humans
    • Use Location Visualization: untick
    • Append Text To Query: scope:humans 
      (this allows your search results to show the first 20 people always, even when no query is specified)

 

Your search results should begin to show something, but it's not right:

image

  • Some fields are mapped automatically, here, the Job Title, Company, WorkPhone and Email fields have come across.  We're missing two significant ones

 

Configure Search Metadata Properties

 

  • Fix PreferredName

    image

    Add both "ows_FullName(Text) and ows_Full_x0020_Name(Text)
    Tick "Include values from all crawled properties mapped
  • PictureUrl

    image

    Add ows_Contact_x0020_Photo(Text)
    Tick Include values from all crawled properties mapped
  • Full crawl again.

 

The End result

 

image

 

Real users and Contact list entries displayed together in the search results!

XML deserialization - cannot have child contents to be deserialized as an object

/

Element MyValue from namespace http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/Services cannot have child contents to be deserialized as an object. Please use XmlNode[] to deserialize this pattern of XML.

 

I was playing with DataContractSerializer, and getting this strange error when performing de-serialization (turning XML back into an object of type MyClass).

[DataContract]
public class MyClass
{
    [DataMember]
    public string MyName;

    [DataMember]
    public object MyValue;
}

 

The error message actually is pretty clear about what the issue is, but English is a sucky language.  Let me highlight what the error message is really saying:

Element MyValue from namespace http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/Services cannot have child contents to be deserialized as an object. Please use XmlNode[] to deserialize this pattern of XML.

Read it again:

Element MyValue cannot be deserialized as an object.

 

The deserializer was actually talking about the fact that it can't turn <MyValue>1</MyValue> back into an object of the type Object.

If you change your DataContract to

[DataContract]
public class MyClass
{
    [DataMember]
    public string MyName;

    [DataMember]
    public string MyValue;
}

 

Then the deserializer will be happy.

InfoPath 2013 uses new Online Pictures instead of Clip Art

/

 

The InfoPath 2013 Preview doesn't really have many new features.  But this one little one made me smile.

image

In InfoPath 2013, the Clip Art ribbon is replaced with Online Pictures.

image

For those of you wondering what was there before, in InfoPath 2010 it looked like this.  Yes it's that little button that we never used.

This dialog appears when you click it.

image

 

Searching for a victim's face...

image

 

image

 

A few things would make this even more awesome:

  • Add my commonly used Clip Arts to my skydrive, and link it up.  This probably works already, except my Office 2013 Preview isn't hooked up to my normal Microsoft Account.
  • Allow additional websites, I find iconfinder.com to be extremely good.
  • Or allow URL to be used directly in the dialog.

SharePoint - The object has been updated by another user since it was last fetched - while updating Site Columns

/

This is the second time I've been bitten by this error.

Exception:

The object has been updated by another user since it was last fetched

 

And both times I had forgotten why, and then panicked, then searched online, found articles talking about this, and figured it all out, only to recall in the last minute...

Hey, wait a minute, this happened before.

The story begins as soon as you are trying to update your site columns.  Either via the web UI, or via code, or via PowerShell.  And then you hit this error.

The cause:

This is most likely because you've created the site column using an invalid Schema XML, in particular, you've embedded the version field in the <Field> definition.

<Field Type="Text" DisplayName="OrganisationName" Required="FALSE" EnforceUniqueValues="FALSE" Indexed="FALSE" MaxLength="255" ID="{guid-xxx}" StaticName="OrganisationName" Name="OrganisationName" Version="1" ></Field>

 

The Version attribute could have got in via a number of means, but most likely you exported the existing Schema from somewhere and it got embedded.

 

My explanation:

When you update a site column, SharePoint expects that the version number of this site column object increments after the update.  But because you are updating the site column via Schema and forcing the version to be fixed all the time, that number doesn't increment.  SharePoint now thinks there's something really wrong.

 

The Fix:

Remove the Version attribute from the Field definition, and then redeploy that definition to the server.

<Field Type="Text" DisplayName="OrganisationName" Required="FALSE" EnforceUniqueValues="FALSE" Indexed="FALSE" MaxLength="255" ID="{guid-xxx}" StaticName="OrganisationName" Name="OrganisationName" ></Field>

Windows 8

/

Windows 8 is coming, and I wanted to say something to set people's expectations right.  I think it'll help people align their views and appreciate this new version, if they choose to upgrade.

Don't expect Windows 8 to be Windows 7 plus more shiny new stuff.  Windows 8 was never designed in the same sense that Windows 7 was actually just Windows Vista plus more polish.  If you install Windows 8 thinking to get a minor update, you will be shocked.

Windows 8 is actually a completely different beast.  Designed with different goals altogether.  It just happens to run Windows (Windows 7) applications.

But at its core, Windows 8 is a different thing.

 

Historically, there was a suitable analogy, Microsoft build Windows NT to be the better kernel going forward, and combined the two systems streams (95, 98, ME) and (NT, 2000) finally into the same stream from XP.  Windows 2000 was vastly different beast from Windows 95, because it was fundamentally a different system, it just happened to run the old Windows 95 apps.