Flow - lightweight fast template engine using Split twice

Technique 2 β€” Building a Lightweight Template Engine (Using Split Twice)

Take this example (using a handle-bar stil syntax)

ABC {{def}} GHI {{jkl}} MN

Using a dictionary (Compose)

{
  "def": "fish 🐟",
  "jkl": "chips 🍟"
}

We want to build a mini-template engine.
Now you might think - ah ok, let’s get some variables in here.

But John really dislikes variables in fact most of these flow hacks are how to not use variables. So how do you do this without variables?

1. Split on {{

split(outputs('Compose'), '{{')

result

[ 
  "ABC ",
  "def}} GHI ",
  "jkl}} MN"
]

2. Split each on }}

inside each item, split again

split(item(),'}}')

So now our original string becomes either:
["ABC "]

or

["def"," GHI "]

Recap, combine step 1 and 2

Select:
  from: split(outputs('Compose'), '{{')
  item: split(item(), '}}')

3. Conditional replacement using dictionary lookup

if(
  equals(length(item()),2),
  concat(
    outputs('Dictionary')?[item()?[0]],
    item()?[1]
  ),
  item()?[0]
)

Hidden insight

So the trick is this. If the row has 2 elements, that means the first element is a token, the rest is the remainder. If the row has only 1 element - then just return that.

[
  item()[0],
  dictionary[item()[0]] item()[1],
  dictionary[item()[0]] item()[1]
]
==>
[
  "ABC",
  "fish 🐟 GHI",
  "chips 🍟 MN"
]

If you want your dictionary lookup to be case insensitive, you can add toLower() to wrap around item()?[0]

4. Join it all together

join(body('Select'),'')

Result

ABC fish 🐟 GHI chips 🍟 MN

No loops.
No apply-to-each.
No regex.
No variables.
Super fast zero-second action.

This technique lets you:

  • Build dynamic email templates

  • Create server-side HTML rendering logic

  • Replace merge fields safely

  • Do token replacement in Dataverse text

  • Build dynamic document generators

All using standard Power Automate expressions.


Mathematically Elegant way to Flatten an Array of Arrays in Power Automate

When working with data in Power Automate, you may encounter nested arrays (arrays within arrays)β€”especially when dealing with JSON responses, SharePoint lists, or API results. However, many Power Automate actions require a flat array to work properly.

In this post, I'll show you a mathematically elegant way to flatten an array of arrays into a single-level array using Power Automate expressions.

Understanding the Problem

Let's say you have the following array:

[
    ["Ford", "Toyota"],
    ["BMW", "Audi"],
    ["Honda", "Nissan"]
]

Instead of dealing with nested arrays, you want to flatten it into a single array:

["Ford", "Toyota", "BMW", "Audi", "Honda", "Nissan"]

The slow way - Array variable

The slow way is to use an array variable, then while looping through the top level array, append or union the results into the array variable.

Variables are so slow I don’t even want to make them and add a picture.

The faster way - String manipulation

Convert the array into JSON string, remove the extra array [ and ] characters, re-construct the array in string, and convert back to JSON.

This is a method I was using, it’s much quicker, but has a risk of needing to be careful when removing bracket characters. If you have nested JSON objects this needs more care.

The new fastest way - div and mod flattening

To understand this - you need two numbers: m and n
m = number of elements in the top array
n = number of elements in the child array

Create a range of the total result size of the array (m) * (n)

Use select - loop through this range of numbers, then for each, select the nested result using:
outputs(β€˜nested-items’)?[ div( item(), outputs(β€˜n’)) ]?[mod( item(), outputs(β€˜n’)) ]

do you see how elegant this is πŸ€”

From:
range(
  0, 
  mul( 
    length(outputs('Nested_Array')),
    outputs('Compose_-_child_size')
  )
)

Map:
body('Nested_Array')
?[div(item(),outputs('Compose_-_child_size'))]
?[mod(item(),outputs('Compose_-_child_size'))]

what’s going on here?
let’s picture for each of the 6 elements above.

0 = array[0][0] div(0, 2) = 0, mod(0,2) = 0
1 = array[0][1] div(1, 2) = 0, mod(1,2) = 1
2 = array[1][0]
3 = array[1][1]
4 = array[2][0] div(4, 2) = 2, mod(4,2) = 0
5 = array[2][1]

so in one select, we can flatten an (m * n) -sized array.

What if my child array is irregularly sized?
That’s OK. By using ?[n] Select will return null for that element, so we can follow the select with a filter-array to remove the nulls.

Bonus

This works wonderfully with Pieter’s Method, which returns array of Body jsons.

Bonus

This works well for cross-join of two arrays, and then flattening them into one.
(These bonus ideas are massive additional blog posts let me know if want to read them…)

A debug tip for complex conditions in Power Automate #FlowNinjaHack 126

This is #FlowNinjaHack 126

Sometimes, we have complex Condition blocks in Power Automate.

And when we run the flow, it just shows β€œfalse”, which is a bit hard to debug.

One way I’ve started doing, is to write a Compose debug statement that shows the output of each component of my condition.
I show the Code View here as well so you get the idea.

To convert from the Condition block to these expressions can be a bit tricky, since you can’t use Code View easily for Condition. So here’s a second hack.

Paste this to a text editor, something that understands JSON. You’ll get this part.

        "type": "If",
        "expression": {
            "and": [
                {
                    "not": {
                        "equals": [
                            "@outputs('Get_item_-_Bulletins_list')?['body/Status/Value']",
                            "Draft"
                        ]
                    }
                },
                {
                    "not": {
                        "contains": [
                            "@body('Select_page_filename')",
                            "@variables('varTitle')"
                        ]
                    }
                },
                {
                    "contains": [
                        "@body('Select_page_filename')",
                        "@outputs('Compose_-_Old_Title')"
                    ]
                }
            ]
        }

Now this is still not the right format, but you can then go from this to:

not(contains(body('Select_page_filename'), outputs('Compose_-_Old_Title'))

With a lot less pain.
This is the debug message you’ll see when you run now.

Updates to Flow Studio App in 2023 October

There’s been a series of updates to Flow Studio App on our development build, as I’m preparing to push this next stable build to production, I thought I’d take this time to list down lots of changes we’ve done in this latest series of updates.

Production 1.1.51

Dev 1.1.58

Oh what happened to the red colour!

  • Switching UI Control Set towards Fluent 2

    We are in the middle of switching the overall look and feel and UX experience from default Telerik component style to the new Telerik + Fluent style, which would be more inline with the experience in Power Platform and also M365.

  • Switching primary colour from red to a β€œwhale” colour

    First is switching away from the red colour - so we can actually use red to indicate serious issues happening elsewhere on the screen that demands your attention, like that "Flow Suspension” notice on the top-right.

  • On Flows, Flow (Admin) and Flows (solution) screens, we added pagination controls, this greatly helps rendering the grid when you have hundreds of flows.
    Don’t worry, search and sort is applied prior to paging, so it won’t leave you with having to browse through several pages before finding your item.

  • The grid menu dropdown filter had an bug fix that allows us to select the fields more accurately. Previosuly, the menu often lose focus and we aren’t able to easily select a field to filter.

  • Flow Diagram had several fixes

  • Approvals tab had more fixes.

  • Settings tab is brought back - we will be making lots more user-configurable settings very soon.

  • We tidied up the overall page styling and reduce wasted padding around the grid and window (but do give us feedback if we mess something up on your device)

The next lot of updates will begin to drop on dev branch really soon.

Power Automate API changes - v2 Admin scope now needs user_impersonation

This blog post is about two major updates to Flow Studio App and Flow Studio for Enterprise.

MSAL v2 Update

First one, we finally updated Flow Studio to MSAL v2 there’s a few reasons for this, but primarily, this is because we want to support modern browsers that are now by default disabling 3rd party cookies, which prevented previous authentication via hidden iframe method in earlier versions of MSAL and ADALjs.

Incidentally, this also means Flow Studio App now works on iPad and Safari. And should work better for many customers within enterprise that has 3rd party cookie disabled.

MSAL also supports multiple accounts so that’s an interesting scenario in the future to support multi-user or multi-tenancy? We’ll see.


Power Automate Admin API Scope

Secondly, we have a note on Power Automate API changes and how it affects us.

Power Automate /scopes/admin/v2/ supports fetching up to 250 flows per request prior to paging, by comparison, v1 only supports 50 flows. This means reading flows as admin is once again much quicker.


But we’ve also noticed that admin flow requests now need an additional user_impersonation scope.

β€œAccess Microsoft Flow as signed in user” (nice name!)




When customers login to Flow Studio App v1.1.45 or later, you will be asked to re-consent due to this additional scope.